The UNTOLD Slave Trade! - Arab Muslims & Africans. W/ @Ben-Israelreports

[Neha.Kulkarni]

YouTube

Today we dive into a taboo subject that many are scared to speak about. The #Arab/Muslim Slave trade.

A lot has been reported on about the #European Christian #Slave trade but most act like this trade didn’t exist.

I am to show that the religion of Islam is the reason for this racist trade.

Copy of my comments:

You're stoking the fire LoL and I love it! I have mentioned this many times and you get ignored or sidelined by M appeasers...Filled with hypocrisy, just the way they are! Many African slaves were transported from Africa to India during this period...One of the most famous known African Slves in the Mughal armies was "Malik Ambar (1548 – 1626) Malik, rejected his ishlamic masters and formed and alliances with his Hindu counterparts. They fought their first battle united (Battle of Bhatvadi 1624) and defeated the Moslem M ughals...This is a part of history which is not taught...And ignored for many reasons.

It be great if you can make a video on Malik, to reach out his achievements to other Africans...In India , among the Mahrattas he is well known...This is how the Siddhi (African) Indian community was freed and ended up in India..After the M oslem sla ve trade!
Msilms boast how slves are treated well, but here you have a prime example of a slve who rejected their j ihadi rubbish and book!

Ibn Battuta (1304-1377) also talks about the Arab slve trade in his journals....Which Many Mos lems convincingly deny ...Untill you quote from their own sources, they cry propaganda...They are shameless M bunch!

See, like you...If you talk about the Arab Black slve trade, you are silenced or not heard...In India, if you talk about M slave trade, or the inv asion ...You are called a hater. But its okay, to talk about colonism, the Holocausts or white slve trade...Just do not talk about the M and their vile deeds in the name of their "holy book"
Huge double standards across the world!

5:54 What you're describing here is the result of Pakistanis LoL...Once upon a time, their ancestors were Hindus, captured slves, inbred and remolded into Ishilam.
The entire north region of India, from Afghanistan to Sindh were once Hindu pagan lands, now today all Islamized...They tried to co nquer the whole of In dia but failed...Hence Hin duism and our culture survived after many wars, battles etc. African history in that sense is very much similar.

They automatically start defending their sla ve masters, its what Pak istanis do when they cry about ishilam. Similar to how you described the African mindset.
Stockholm syndrome. They start justifying how life is all grand under their new rulers LoL..But in actual fact, they were the first cowards to accept slvery out of fear of death, hence became muslamaan LoL

13:50 Sharia law is based on hadiths...So, it becomes catch 22 when Moslems try to worm their way out the conversation...Its the best way to combat their replies.
LoL

24:13 The Dravidian concept was spread by Christian historians to divide the Hindus of India, between north and south.
By claiming the Aryan race came from outside of India 2,000 years ago which is a lie...Theres no mention of Dravidian races in vedic scriptures, but the term Aryan is mentioned many times well over 5,000 years ago....But yeh, Pakistanis are captured sl ves (Ex Hindus) who were twisted, molded into Ishilam for 800 years.
They run around the world acting like they are Turkish or Arab decedents , but nothing more then children of cowards who submitted to warl ords.

27:09..Finally a discussion on this! I made a video on that too! The destruction of Kab ah LoL..
."Buy one get one free"
��

41:50..Not true. The Mahrattas were of Brahmin background, they never chased any dalits or black slves out of In dia, in fact their armies and generals were of slve backgounds and mixed variety and fought side by side against the Mu gahl opressors. Malik Ambar .battle of Bhatvadi 1624 etc and many others..In regards to them being chased out of India, that is false. Many Hindus transmigrated before the rise of Ishilam during the Buddhist period and earlier towards Europe and Africa from south India. Many even settled in Egypt..There are many historical accounts, which have been suppressed..Again to spread the Christian narrative of world creation....The reason why I know this is gibberish is bcoz logically, many other ethnic groups came and settled into India in hge amounts during the rise of Ihislam, and none of these groups were chased out, Zoroastrians, Jews, Persians etc...They were given safe passage and lands to settle in India.

41:50 To simplify his statement...India had the spice the trade route set up , along the "silk route" (a historical event and fact) Long before Ishlam had even set roots.
India (Hindus) were trading with the Romans, Persians and even Egypt...Long before any nonsense...So this is another reason why so many H indus left India during the earlier period, merchants , travellers...So, this rubbish about Dalits being chased out...Does not match with historical events. Many became nomad or drifters. etc So unless you can prove that Dalits were chased out of Ind ia before the Roman empire, well , it makes you claim totally false.

43:00 I'm glad he mentioned the Siddhi people, but he should have elaborated on them more and the slve trade. A video on them would be good, some of them do face discrimination in India but that's due to lack of history and knowledge not anything else...India (Afghanistan) was invded 640AD by Mo slems..Arab slve trade began shorty after. The silk route, spice trade dates back to the times before Alexander the Great

51:48 Genuine Turks are rejecting Arab Ishilamic nonsense. That is why Erdogan lost in latest elections. His goal was to bring back Sharia law..But the average Turk, dislikes Ishlam ..In Pkistan, they bootlick Turkey for being all "Arab" ...You should read the works of Necip Fazil Kisakurek (1904 –1983) a very disgusting man

49:00 I don't agree that blacks / Africans were the first race (with respect) its easy to spin that narrative without understanding Indian or even Chinese history.
India's history goes back 10,000 years and even further...So, what you're basically saying is (similar to Abrahamic nonsense) An African went all the way to India, eventually had offsprings, set of a chain of events, created a Sanskrit language, then an entire civilization...Later they became Brahmins, who chased out the Dalits, back to Africa which became Somalians of mixed heritage and blah bleh (partially true) ...This is no different to M or Christians telling us we all came from Adam.

Further, India's culture an civilization is independent from others...There were many Kingdoms in India, not to mention the scientific and mathematical contributions for centuries...,Point being, lets just assume an African did go all the way to India as the first human, or with his tribe...Then why did the African traveler not teach his own people all that knowledge before reaching and setting up shop in India?

It was a good discussion, highlight being..Moslems always promote Muhammed Ali and Malcolm x....Ali was a well known boxer before he converted.
So none of his achievements are based on his Muslim outlook. Besides, he was a good boxer (not that I know much about the sport) but Ali was also a womanizer and cheater LoL....As for Malcom x, the Nation of Islam, all of it is far more bizarre then Ishilam itself. Blacks who have lost their identity