The Indian Empire at War and India, Empire and the First World War review - Asian Massive Crew Community 2002/2020
Home Control Panel Gallery Chat Room Arcade Eye Candy Projects Multimedia Networking Search Sign Up

Advertisements



★ ♥ ★ A Multicultural Community that unites people from all over the world ★ ♥ ★
Go Back   Asian Massive Crew Community 2002/2020 > PROFESSIONS / EDUCATION > Social Studies > History
Forgotten Your Password? Register
User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools

The Indian Empire at War and India, Empire and the First World War review
  #1  
Old 17-06-2019
balti's Avatar
balti
Wild Poster
balti is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,535
balti will become famous soon enough
My Mood:
Status:
Do not take life too seriously. You will never get out of it alive

The Indian Empire at War and India, Empire and the First World War review


The Indian Empire at War and India, Empire and the First World War review – a story finally told

The experience of the 1.5 million men who fought in the Indian army during the first world war is at last being recounted, in books by George Morton-Jack and Santanu Das

“At Amritsar they shot who the British told them to.” That short statement in George Morton-Jack’s account of the Indian army in the first world war is blunt and true – and a reminder that the truth can be an inconvenience to the nationalist historian. In a notorious massacre that marked the beginning of the end of British rule in India, hundreds of people died when in April 1919 troops fired into a crowd of demonstrators at the Jallianwala Bagh, a public garden in Amritsar. We know the man who gave the order to fire. Col Reginald Dyer was acclaimed as the empire’s saviour by militant imperialists in Britain, and condemned by others as a bloodthirsty fool. We know about the dead, who had gathered to demand the release of two popular nationalist leaders. But who were the other actors, the men who pulled the triggers when Dyer blew his whistle?

They wore the uniform of the 54th Sikhs, the 59th Scinde Rifles and the 9th Gurkhas and they had been recruited in British India, Nepal and the autonomous borderlands of Afghanistan. Within 10 minutes, these young Sikhs, Hindus and Muslims had fired 1,650 rounds into a peaceful assembly of 20,000 Punjabis of the same faiths. Soon after, a British civil servant recorded the only known comment from the shooters. “Sahib,” said a Gurkha, “while it lasted it was splendid, we fired every round we had.”

Among politicised Indians, the repercussions were profound. The Nobel laureate Rabindranath Tagore renounced his knighthood. MK Gandhi, who had been a prominent army recruiter throughout the first world war, now turned against troops whose services “have been more often used for enslaving us than for protecting us”. As Santanu Das writes, the events were “a huge watershed” that “would irredeemably change the very meaning of war service in the national psyche, and gradually airbrush it out of the nation’s history”.

But in the meantime the behaviour of the Indian army was hardly affected. It continued to follow the orders of its British commanders. A month after Amritsar, 340,000 of its overwhelmingly Indian troops massed on India’s western border to fight – and quickly win – the third Anglo-Afghan war. And from 1921 to 1922, its artillery and armoured cars put down an insurrection in south India known as the Moplah rebellion, killing 2,400 Muslim villagers who were armed with little more than swords.


Why did Indians kill and suppress other Indians on behalf of their foreign rulers? Why did they fight, often bravely, for the British empire in distant theatres of the first world war such as Flanders, Gallipoli and Tanganyika? What did they think of their experience and how did it mark them? These questions lie at the heart of these two rewarding accounts of one of the empire’s most remarkable institutions: in Morton-Jack’s words, the Indian army of 1914-18 was “uniquely multicultural, combining such a variety of humankind into a single brotherhood-in-arms that it was really a modern wonder of the world … a breathtaking array worshipping more gods and speaking more languages than any other army on the planet”. Its ranks contained Christians, Jews, Buddhists, animists and Zoroastrians as well as Hindus, Muslims and Sikhs, speaking many different Indian languages and dialects and sometimes barely understanding the army’s official vernacular, Hindustani, the blend of Hindi and Urdu that British officers used to command their servants.


Advertisement



During the course of the war, a total of about 1.5 million Indian soldiers and non-combatants served in the Indian army; nearly 1.1 million of them were sent overseas; between 50,000 and 70,000 died. Money was of course the obvious attraction. The pay was good by the standards of rural India and there was the prospect of a pension and sometimes even a plot of land on retirement (the last was especially true in Punjab, which provided nearly half the recruits sent abroad). But money alone can’t explain what Das calls India’s “phenomenal war enthusiasm”, at least in the conflict’s early years, before the supply of volunteers began to dry up and administrations had to apply more coercive methods. Another and more perverse recruiter was racism. The non-white people of the empire were keen to prove that they could provide just as able, loyal and courageous an army as any raised in the British counties. A wartime poem in Bengali ran: “Who calls me now a coward base, / And brands my race a coward race? / I’ll brook no more such scoffing word: / My king himself has washed the shame / That fouled so long my stainless name.”

But loyalty and courage did not bring equality. As an early Indian officer in the army noticed, “the Indians are looked upon as inferiors in the scale of humanity”. To preserve their command and control, Morton-Jack writes, the British “relentlessly projected an aura of ascendancy they called their ‘prestige’” – which, as a white British private explained, meant that they needed “to keep the bleeding natives down … the more you are down on them the better they will respect you”. More than that, the British were so terrified of damage to their prestige, this magic ingredient of their success, that they prevented the Indian army from fighting white armies – not because the Indian army might lose but because it might win, and in that way undermine the racial hierarchy.

Indian regiments were organised along lines of tribal, caste and local loyalty, so that, in the words of a secretary of state for India, Charles Wood, “Sikh might fire into Hindu, Gurkha into either, without any scruple in case of need”. In other words, so that in case of an emergency such as mutiny, they would be prepared to kill one another. The outbreak of war put paid to the ban on fighting whites, despite the opposition of Lord Roberts, an old India hand who as young soldier had fought against Indians in the rebellion of 1857 and knew their ferocity. The policy was overturned in a secret meeting of the British government’s war council in August 1914, and before the end of the month an Indian expeditionary force was sailing for France to shore up the British army in its retreat from Mons. The decision to allow brown-skinned troops to fight white ones turned “the first page in a new history of civilisation”, according to the Times, while Lord Curzon, a former viceroy, looked forward to the sight of “the dark-skinned Gurkha making himself at ease in the gardens of Potsdam”.

Nothing like that happened. The Indian infantry was withdrawn from Flanders in 1915, and the idea soon began to grow, to be embedded in subsequent histories, that Indian troops were simply unfitted for this new kind of war: too easily terrified by shellfire, too cold in an unfamiliar climate, too pre-industrial in their culture to cope with mechanised warfare. Some statistics point in that direction. The Indians arrived at the front in October and by 3 November the number of them suffering hand wounds, often if not usually self-inflicted, reached 1,049. Others, after trying hopelessly to shelter in shallow trenches from ferocious German bombardment anand with their officers dead, simply ran away.

Morton-Jack makes two points in their defence: that they were not alone in these reactions – panic under shellfire and self-inflicted wounds were common on all sides – and most of the Indian units, by sticking together and digging in, had saved the overstretched British Expeditionary Force’s line from collapsing at the first battle of Ypres, which in turn saved the entire allied cause. “The Indians naturally do not like shell fire,” wrote their commander, James Willcocks. “Who does?”

Both books reveal the touching humanity of the Indian soldier in his encounter with the European war. A Sikh cavalryman sees a French peasant receive news of his son’s death and marvels at his stoicism when the farmhand, after a minute or two, resumes ploughing his field: “There is no wild lamentation as with us in the Punjab.” A trench diary kept by a young Pathan infantryman contains a list of Urdu words and their English equivalents, including turnip, carrot, parsnip, potatoes, prick, penus (sic), testacles (sic), harsole (sic), brests (sic), fuck and flour. The information is often memorable. Who knew that Germany’s first mosque was constructed for Muslim deserters from the Indian army and its French allies; or could have guessed that the disastrous, disease-ridden campaigns in Mesopotamia and East Africa had Indian soldiers pining for their time in the trenches of Flanders?

The authors have different ambitions. Morton-Jack recounts a comprehensive and lively history of the Indian army in all its tragedies, difficulties and occasional triumphs. Das, an English literature scholar, shows how the war affected Indian soldiers and the society they came from by providing, to quote the author’s intention, “a book about memory and feeling”. Both have to contend, however, with a scarcity of written material other than official papers in government archives – no surprise given that the prewar literacy rate in Punjab was 6.4% for men and 0.3% among women. Both, therefore, often use the same evidence, including the desperate letter that Havildar Abdul Rahman in France sent home to Baluchistan in May 1915: “For God’s sake, don’t come, don’t come, don’t come to this war in Europe … tell my brother Muhammud Yakub Khan for God’s sake not to enlist.”

After Indian independence, the story of the imperial army suffered from decades of Indian awkwardness and British neglect. The men who served in it, Das writes, were “doomed to wander in the no man’s land between the Eurocentric narratives of the ‘Great War and Modern Memory’ and nationalist histories of India”. Gradually, they are being found again and brought home.

https://www.theguardian.com/books/20...anu-das-review


It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.
Aristotle
Reply With Quote

5 Lastest Threads by balti
Thread Forum Last Poster Replies Views Last Post
34th anniversary of the genocide of Kashmiri... Topics & Posts For Public Viewing balti 0 1 24-02-2024 17:35
UK Prison Population Statistics Topics & Posts For Public Viewing Asiansoul 2 3 24-02-2024 16:23
What are your thoughts on Bageshwar Baba? Topics & Posts For Public Viewing MahaRani 5 6 30-03-2023 06:44
Purchasing power of USA dollar will decline! Topics & Posts For Public Viewing Asiansoul 5 6 20-04-2022 06:16
Erdogan’s Political Journey: From Victimised... Europe balti 0 1 11-01-2022 04:14

Reply
Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Captives: Britain, Empire and the World 1600-1850 raajveer Topics & Posts For Public Viewing 0 26-01-2019 17:06
Great Kings of Sangama Dynasty of Vijaynagar Empire I Sangama Empire raajveer History 0 16-04-2017 23:45
6 Reasons Why the Mughal Empire Declined in India raajveer History 0 16-04-2017 23:34



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Bookmarks

 
New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 00:43.

www.Asian-Massive-Crew.co.uk  | www.Asian-Massive-Crew.com  | www.AsianMassiveCrew.com  |   www.AsianMassiveCrew.co.uk  

 Graphics, Design & Layout  by Web Designerz - The Power To Create..!

Copyright © 2002 Onwards  www.Kalki.co.uk  | Website Hosted by Reality Host

   

DISCLAIMER: Every reasonable effort has been made, to make this site a peaceful yet an entertaining venue. 
The creator nor it's staff shall have neither liability nor responsibility to any person, company or entity whatsoever, 
with respect to any loss, damages or misunderstandings arising from any information or speculation contained
in any of the topics and its updates. Each member is responsible for his/her own thoughts of action when expressed!