SYE RAA NARASIMHA REDDY Movie REVIEW!! | Chiranjeevi, Amitabh Bachchan

09-10-2019 17:01 crazy_kiran#1
#SyeRaaReview #SyeRaaNarasimhaReddy
SYE RAA NARASIMHA REDDY Movie REVIEW!! | Chiranjeevi, Amitabh Bachchan
10-10-2019 00:41 KALKI#2
I LEFT A COMMENT:

Quote

UNTAUGHT HISTORY: DEFENDER OF HINDUISM, RIDICULED BY CHRISTIAN MISSIONARIES:
- Charles Stuart (1758–1828) An officer in the East India Company Army wrote:
“Whenever I look around me, in the vast region of Hindoo Mythology,
I discover piety in the garb of allegory: and I see Morality, at every turn, blended with every tale; and, as far as I can rely
on my own judgment, it appears the most complete and ample system of Moral Allegory that the world has ever produced.”

Source: British Orientalism and the Bengal Renaissance 1969
Author: David Kopf ISBN-10: 0520006658
https://www.amazon.co.uk/British-Ori.../dp/0520006658


Charles Stuart (c. 1758 – 31 March 1828) was an officer in the East India Company Army and is well known for being one of the few

British officers to embrace Hindu culture while stationed there, earning the nickname Hindoo Stuart. He also wrote books and

several newspaper articles extolling Hindu culture and tradition and urging its adoption by Europeans settled in India, and

deploring the attitudes and activities of the Utilitarians and missionaries who deprecated Indian culture.

In his teens, Stuart left Ireland for India, where he remained for the rest of his life. He served in the army and starting as a

cadet, he rose through the ranks to become a Major-General. His last command was the Saugor Field Force.

Stuart enthusiastically embraced Hindu culture and championed the same in his writings and discourse, which earned him the nickname

Hindoo Stuart. V. C. P. Hodson's biography of Stuart mentions that he "had studied the language, manners and customs of the natives

of this country with so much enthusiasm, his intimacy with them ... obtained for him the name of Hindoo Stuart".

Stuart took to Hinduism both in its religious aspects and as a way of daily life. He adopted many Hindu customs and routines of

daily life, including bathing in the Ganges at Calcutta every morning.

05-01-2020 01:00 jay999#3
Finished watching it today..8-)

where do I start?

Movies starts well, then all of a sudden there's display of village life and simpletons being all merry...

The scene where the Muslim women came out in burqas in the hot blazing sun, and Papa Khan performing murthi pooja made no sense...wtf was that shit?

The dialogue right before the battle (about 1:30 mins into the movie)
Narasaimha says..or I think it was Amitabh Bachan:^) said...

'That wars were fought for power in India...but this will be the first war for independence"

what utter shit (N)

India was attacked and invaded by Islam (Muslims) with mass conversions and rapes...and somehow glossed over history giving it a liberal spin..

Pratap Singh and Prithviraj fought to regain the land back from the Arab invaders,

King Hemu fought to restore Hindu rule after 350 years of Islamic oppression...

There's no mention of any of this in the movie...

I mean, ok..sure they want to show Hindus and Muslims some fractions of society living in peace..but c'mon, The British came to India in 1600's...

Jhassi Ki rani is telling the story in 1857/58 right before her final battler with the British...

Which means Narasimha's first battle took place at least 15 years or so before then...

King Hemu died in 1556...

They liberalised and spoiled the movie with fake bullshit as usual
05-01-2020 13:59 diva_2620#4
Quote
Originally Posted by jay999 »

Finished watching it today..8-)

where do I start?

Movies starts well, then all of a sudden there's display of village life and simpletons being all merry...

The scene where the Muslim women came out in burqas in the hot blazing sun, and Papa Khan performing murthi pooja made no sense...wtf was that shit?

The dialogue right before the battle (about 1:30 mins into the movie)
Narasaimha says..or I think it was Amitabh Bachan:^) said...

'That wars were fought for power in India...but this will be the first war for independence"

what utter shit (N)

India was attacked and invaded by Islam (Muslims) with mass conversions and rapes...and somehow glossed over history giving it a liberal spin..

Pratap Singh and Prithviraj fought to regain the land back from the Arab invaders,

King Hemu fought to restore Hindu rule after 350 years of Islamic oppression...

There's no mention of any of this in the movie...

I mean, ok..sure they want to show Hindus and Muslims some fractions of society living in peace..but c'mon, The British came to India in 1600's...

Jhassi Ki rani is telling the story in 1857/58 right before her final battler with the British...

Which means Narasimha's first battle took place at least 15 years or so before then...

King Hemu died in 1556...

They liberalised and spoiled the movie with fake bullshit as usual




I didn't like it...the movie was so slow and long..

I was thinking the same, I never heard of this Papa Khan?? I thought idol worshiping was wrong in Islam? An he was doing murthi pooja??

They didn't even mention people like Rani Durgavatti

Tammana looked pretty bu her role was wasted I think..

05-01-2020 19:24 ---RuFfEdGe---#5
Disappointing film

and some of the scenes were so fake
07-01-2020 17:45 shexy#6
Quote
Originally Posted by diva_2620 »

Quote
Originally Posted by jay999 »

Finished watching it today..8-)

where do I start?

Movies starts well, then all of a sudden there's display of village life and simpletons being all merry...

The scene where the Muslim women came out in burqas in the hot blazing sun, and Papa Khan performing murthi pooja made no sense...wtf was that shit?

The dialogue right before the battle (about 1:30 mins into the movie)
Narasaimha says..or I think it was Amitabh Bachan:^) said...

'That wars were fought for power in India...but this will be the first war for independence"

what utter shit (N)

India was attacked and invaded by Islam (Muslims) with mass conversions and rapes...and somehow glossed over history giving it a liberal spin..

Pratap Singh and Prithviraj fought to regain the land back from the Arab invaders,

King Hemu fought to restore Hindu rule after 350 years of Islamic oppression...

There's no mention of any of this in the movie...

I mean, ok..sure they want to show Hindus and Muslims some fractions of society living in peace..but c'mon, The British came to India in 1600's...

Jhassi Ki rani is telling the story in 1857/58 right before her final battler with the British...

Which means Narasimha's first battle took place at least 15 years or so before then...

King Hemu died in 1556...

They liberalised and spoiled the movie with fake bullshit as usual




I didn't like it...the movie was so slow and long..

I was thinking the same, I never heard of this Papa Khan?? I thought idol worshiping was wrong in Islam? An he was doing murthi pooja??

They didn't even mention people like Rani Durgavatti

Tammana looked pretty bu her role was wasted I think..

I thought the film was good it was a bit loooNg but ok...i was told it was a true story?? the songs were rubbish :^) could have been better :| +o(
09-01-2020 03:47 SoNi_kUr#7
i didn't like it..was so long and boring
10-01-2020 00:30 jay999#8
Quote
Originally Posted by diva_2620 »

Quote
Originally Posted by jay999 »

Finished watching it today..8-)

where do I start?

Movies starts well, then all of a sudden there's display of village life and simpletons being all merry...

The scene where the Muslim women came out in burqas in the hot blazing sun, and Papa Khan performing murthi pooja made no sense...wtf was that shit?

The dialogue right before the battle (about 1:30 mins into the movie)
Narasaimha says..or I think it was Amitabh Bachan:^) said...

'That wars were fought for power in India...but this will be the first war for independence"

what utter shit (N)

India was attacked and invaded by Islam (Muslims) with mass conversions and rapes...and somehow glossed over history giving it a liberal spin..

Pratap Singh and Prithviraj fought to regain the land back from the Arab invaders,

King Hemu fought to restore Hindu rule after 350 years of Islamic oppression...

There's no mention of any of this in the movie...

I mean, ok..sure they want to show Hindus and Muslims some fractions of society living in peace..but c'mon, The British came to India in 1600's...

Jhassi Ki rani is telling the story in 1857/58 right before her final battler with the British...

Which means Narasimha's first battle took place at least 15 years or so before then...

King Hemu died in 1556...

They liberalised and spoiled the movie with fake bullshit as usual




I didn't like it...the movie was so slow and long..

I was thinking the same, I never heard of this Papa Khan?? I thought idol worshiping was wrong in Islam? An he was doing murthi pooja??

They didn't even mention people like Rani Durgavatti

Tammana looked pretty bu her role was wasted I think..


It was shit
10-01-2020 07:09 eesha01#9
Quote
Originally Posted by diva_2620 »

Quote
Originally Posted by jay999 »

Finished watching it today..8-)

where do I start?

Movies starts well, then all of a sudden there's display of village life and simpletons being all merry...

The scene where the Muslim women came out in burqas in the hot blazing sun, and Papa Khan performing murthi pooja made no sense...wtf was that shit?

The dialogue right before the battle (about 1:30 mins into the movie)
Narasaimha says..or I think it was Amitabh Bachan:^) said...

'That wars were fought for power in India...but this will be the first war for independence"

what utter shit (N)

India was attacked and invaded by Islam (Muslims) with mass conversions and rapes...and somehow glossed over history giving it a liberal spin..

Pratap Singh and Prithviraj fought to regain the land back from the Arab invaders,

King Hemu fought to restore Hindu rule after 350 years of Islamic oppression...

There's no mention of any of this in the movie...

I mean, ok..sure they want to show Hindus and Muslims some fractions of society living in peace..but c'mon, The British came to India in 1600's...

Jhassi Ki rani is telling the story in 1857/58 right before her final battler with the British...

Which means Narasimha's first battle took place at least 15 years or so before then...

King Hemu died in 1556...

They liberalised and spoiled the movie with fake bullshit as usual




I didn't like it...the movie was so slow and long..

I was thinking the same, I never heard of this Papa Khan?? I thought idol worshiping was wrong in Islam? An he was doing murthi pooja??

They didn't even mention people like Rani Durgavatti

Tammana looked pretty bu her role was wasted I think..

I fell asleep
12-01-2020 11:32 diva_2620#10
Quote
Originally Posted by shexy »

Quote
Originally Posted by diva_2620 »

Quote
Originally Posted by jay999 »

Finished watching it today..8-)

where do I start?

Movies starts well, then all of a sudden there's display of village life and simpletons being all merry...

The scene where the Muslim women came out in burqas in the hot blazing sun, and Papa Khan performing murthi pooja made no sense...wtf was that shit?

The dialogue right before the battle (about 1:30 mins into the movie)
Narasaimha says..or I think it was Amitabh Bachan:^) said...

'That wars were fought for power in India...but this will be the first war for independence"

what utter shit (N)

India was attacked and invaded by Islam (Muslims) with mass conversions and rapes...and somehow glossed over history giving it a liberal spin..

Pratap Singh and Prithviraj fought to regain the land back from the Arab invaders,

King Hemu fought to restore Hindu rule after 350 years of Islamic oppression...

There's no mention of any of this in the movie...

I mean, ok..sure they want to show Hindus and Muslims some fractions of society living in peace..but c'mon, The British came to India in 1600's...

Jhassi Ki rani is telling the story in 1857/58 right before her final battler with the British...

Which means Narasimha's first battle took place at least 15 years or so before then...

King Hemu died in 1556...

They liberalised and spoiled the movie with fake bullshit as usual




I didn't like it...the movie was so slow and long..

I was thinking the same, I never heard of this Papa Khan?? I thought idol worshiping was wrong in Islam? An he was doing murthi pooja??

They didn't even mention people like Rani Durgavatti

Tammana looked pretty bu her role was wasted I think..

I thought the film was good it was a bit loooNg but ok...i was told it was a true story?? the songs were rubbish :^) could have been better :| +o(

Based on a true story , they skipped out quite a lot, political correctness i think......8-) They portrayed the British evil and no mention of the Arab invasion or other kings and queens...